DeepSeek V4 Flash: Price, Context, Benchmarks, and Release Details

DeepSeek provisional listing open weights · first seen Oct 8, 2026 · score computed Oct 9, 2026, 01:50 UTC
56.2
SI Score (method si-v3-retained-evidence-2)
#78 of 140 ranked
53% confidence 53 percent, Medium confidence — 3 of 7 expected sources in
Coverage 43% of expected source weight · 100% confidence at 80% coverage

Pillar breakdown

Coding (weight 40 percent) 52.4
Math (weight 15 percent) 74.5
Preference (weight 15 percent) 76.1
Reasoning (weight 30 percent) 69.5

Pillar weights: reasoning 30% · math 15% · coding 40% · preference 15%. Benchmark results use fixed 0–100 scales before averaging; incomplete evidence is shrunk toward 50.

Facts

Input price / 1M
$0.30LiteLLMFirst-party API Standard token rate; MIT LiteLLM transcription. Provider documentation: https://api-docs.deepseek.com/quick_start/pricing. Exact endpoint only; cache/batch/long-context rates excluded Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗
Output price / 1M
$1.20LiteLLMFirst-party API Standard token rate; MIT LiteLLM transcription. Provider documentation: https://api-docs.deepseek.com/quick_start/pricing. Exact endpoint only; cache/batch/long-context rates excluded Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗
Context window
1Mmodels.devPublished source fact Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗
Max output
384Kmodels.devPublished source fact Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗
Released
Apr 24, 2026models.devPublished source fact Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗
Open weights
Yesmodels.devPublished source fact Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗
License
not yet reported
Input modalities
textmodels.devPublished source fact Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗

Benchmark results

24 results
Benchmark Raw result Normalized (0–100) Pillar
gpqa diamond 88.1%Official model cards via models.devLab-reported; metric pass@1; transcribed by MIT models.dev catalog; not independently evaluated [variant] preview checkpoint; max effort Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation; MIT transcription
Open source ↗
88.1 reasoning
hle 34.8%Official model cards via models.devLab-reported; metric pass@1; transcribed by MIT models.dev catalog; not independently evaluated [variant] preview checkpoint; max effort; without tools Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation; MIT transcription
Open source ↗
34.8 reasoning
hle tools 45.1%Official model cards via models.devLab-reported; metric pass@1; transcribed by MIT models.dev catalog; not independently evaluated [variant] preview checkpoint; max effort; with tools Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation; MIT transcription
Open source ↗
45.1 reasoning
livebench coding code completion 2026_06_25 65.2%LiveBenchLiveBench subtask result; dataset edition 2026_06_25; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the score CSV, not the dataset edition or individual evaluation date [variant] 2026_06_25Published Oct 7, 2026 Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation; Apache-2.0 code
Open source ↗
65.2 coding
livebench coding code generation 2026_06_25 73.2%LiveBenchLiveBench subtask result; dataset edition 2026_06_25; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the score CSV, not the dataset edition or individual evaluation date [variant] 2026_06_25Published Oct 7, 2026 Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation; Apache-2.0 code
Open source ↗
73.2 coding
livebench coding javascript 2026_06_25 54.5%LiveBenchLiveBench subtask result; dataset edition 2026_06_25; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the score CSV, not the dataset edition or individual evaluation date [variant] 2026_06_25Published Oct 7, 2026 Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation; Apache-2.0 code
Open source ↗
54.5 coding
livebench coding python 2026_06_25 35%LiveBenchLiveBench subtask result; dataset edition 2026_06_25; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the score CSV, not the dataset edition or individual evaluation date [variant] 2026_06_25Published Oct 7, 2026 Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation; Apache-2.0 code
Open source ↗
35.0 coding
livebench coding typescript 2026_06_25 23.3%LiveBenchLiveBench subtask result; dataset edition 2026_06_25; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the score CSV, not the dataset edition or individual evaluation date [variant] 2026_06_25Published Oct 7, 2026 Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation; Apache-2.0 code
Open source ↗
23.3 coding
livebench math amps hard 2026_06_25 98%LiveBenchLiveBench subtask result; dataset edition 2026_06_25; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the score CSV, not the dataset edition or individual evaluation date [variant] 2026_06_25Published Oct 7, 2026 Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation; Apache-2.0 code
Open source ↗
98.0 math
livebench math integrals with game 2026_06_25 37%LiveBenchLiveBench subtask result; dataset edition 2026_06_25; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the score CSV, not the dataset edition or individual evaluation date [variant] 2026_06_25Published Oct 7, 2026 Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation; Apache-2.0 code
Open source ↗
37.0 math
livebench math math comp 2026_06_25 97.1%LiveBenchLiveBench subtask result; dataset edition 2026_06_25; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the score CSV, not the dataset edition or individual evaluation date [variant] 2026_06_25Published Oct 7, 2026 Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation; Apache-2.0 code
Open source ↗
97.1 math
livebench math olympiad 2026_06_25 86.5%LiveBenchLiveBench subtask result; dataset edition 2026_06_25; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the score CSV, not the dataset edition or individual evaluation date [variant] 2026_06_25Published Oct 7, 2026 Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation; Apache-2.0 code
Open source ↗
86.5 math
livebench math simplify 2026_06_25 54.0%LiveBenchLiveBench subtask result; dataset edition 2026_06_25; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the score CSV, not the dataset edition or individual evaluation date [variant] 2026_06_25Published Oct 7, 2026 Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation; Apache-2.0 code
Open source ↗
54.0 math
livebench reasoning connections 2026_06_25 89.5%LiveBenchLiveBench subtask result; dataset edition 2026_06_25; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the score CSV, not the dataset edition or individual evaluation date [variant] 2026_06_25Published Oct 7, 2026 Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation; Apache-2.0 code
Open source ↗
89.5 reasoning
livebench reasoning consecutive events 2026_06_25 59.9%LiveBenchLiveBench subtask result; dataset edition 2026_06_25; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the score CSV, not the dataset edition or individual evaluation date [variant] 2026_06_25Published Oct 7, 2026 Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation; Apache-2.0 code
Open source ↗
59.9 reasoning
livebench reasoning logic with navigation 2026_06_25 64%LiveBenchLiveBench subtask result; dataset edition 2026_06_25; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the score CSV, not the dataset edition or individual evaluation date [variant] 2026_06_25Published Oct 7, 2026 Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation; Apache-2.0 code
Open source ↗
64.0 reasoning
livebench reasoning spatial 2026_06_25 96%LiveBenchLiveBench subtask result; dataset edition 2026_06_25; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the score CSV, not the dataset edition or individual evaluation date [variant] 2026_06_25Published Oct 7, 2026 Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation; Apache-2.0 code
Open source ↗
96.0 reasoning
livebench reasoning theory of mind 2026_06_25 73.1%LiveBenchLiveBench subtask result; dataset edition 2026_06_25; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the score CSV, not the dataset edition or individual evaluation date [variant] 2026_06_25Published Oct 7, 2026 Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation; Apache-2.0 code
Open source ↗
73.1 reasoning
livebench reasoning zebra puzzle 2026_06_25 49.3%LiveBenchLiveBench subtask result; dataset edition 2026_06_25; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the score CSV, not the dataset edition or individual evaluation date [variant] 2026_06_25Published Oct 7, 2026 Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation; Apache-2.0 code
Open source ↗
49.3 reasoning
lmarena text 1432.1 eloLMArena / ArenaPublished source fact [variant] text / overallPublished Oct 2, 2026 Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY-4.0
Open source ↗
76.1 preference
mmlu pro 86.2%Official model cards via models.devLab-reported; metric EM; transcribed by MIT models.dev catalog; not independently evaluated [variant] preview checkpoint; max effort Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation; MIT transcription
Open source ↗
86.2 reasoning
swe bench pro 52.6%Official model cards via models.devLab-reported; metric resolved; transcribed by MIT models.dev catalog; not independently evaluated [variant] preview checkpoint; max effort Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation; MIT transcription
Open source ↗
52.6 coding
swe bench verified 79%Official model cards via models.devLab-reported; metric resolved; transcribed by MIT models.dev catalog; not independently evaluated [variant] Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation; MIT transcription
Open source ↗
79.0 coding
terminal bench v2 0 56.9%Official model cards via models.devLab-reported; metric accuracy; transcribed by MIT models.dev catalog; not independently evaluated [variant] preview checkpoint; max effort; 2.0 Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation; MIT transcription
Open source ↗
56.9 coding

Normalization uses fixed absolute 0–100 scales for each unit, independently of other models that have a result on each benchmark. Coverage and evidence breadth still affect the composite; compare the evaluation conditions before reading a small score gap as decisive. “lab-reported” marks the provider's own published figure.

Sources: in and pending

in Reported (3)

  • Official model cards via models.dev · arrived Oct 8, 2026
  • LiveBench · arrived Oct 8, 2026
  • LMArena / Arena · arrived Oct 8, 2026

pending Awaiting (4)

  • ARC Prize · carries 13% of expected weight
  • Epoch AI Benchmarking · carries 25% of expected weight
  • Humanity’s Last Exam · carries 13% of expected weight
  • Terminal-Bench · carries 6% of expected weight

The confidence % rises as pending sources publish. Some sources never cover some models — that is why 100% confidence arrives at 80% of expected weight, not at full coverage.