Claude Sonnet 5.5: Price, Context, Benchmarks, and Release Details
69.4
SI Score (method si-v3-retained-evidence-2)
#15 of 140 ranked
93% confidence 93 percent, High confidence — 5 of 7 expected sources in
Coverage 75% of expected source weight · 100% confidence at 80% coverage
Pillar breakdown
Coding (weight 40 percent) 60.0
Math (weight 15 percent) 90.5
Preference (weight 15 percent) 79.1
Reasoning (weight 30 percent) 88.6
Pillar weights: reasoning 30% · math 15% · coding 40% · preference 15%. Benchmark results use fixed 0–100 scales before averaging; incomplete evidence is shrunk toward 50.
Facts
- Input price / 1M
- $2.00Anthropic models & pricingOfficial Claude API; lowest short-context on-demand tier; batch/cache/long-context rates excluded
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗ - Output price / 1M
- $10.00Anthropic models & pricingOfficial Claude API; lowest short-context on-demand tier; batch/cache/long-context rates excluded
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗ - Context window
- 1MAnthropic models & pricingOfficial Claude API; lowest short-context on-demand tier; batch/cache/long-context rates excluded
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗ - Max output
- 128KAnthropic models & pricingOfficial Claude API; lowest short-context on-demand tier; batch/cache/long-context rates excluded
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗ - Released
- Sep 28, 2026Anthropic models & pricingOfficial Claude API; lowest short-context on-demand tier; batch/cache/long-context rates excluded
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗ - Open weights
- Nomodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - License
- not yet reported
- Input modalities
- text, image, pdfmodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗
Benchmark results
24 results| Benchmark | Raw result | Normalized (0–100) | Pillar |
|---|---|---|---|
| frontiermath tier 4 v2 | 80.5%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] maxPublished Sep 29, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY Open source ↗ | 80.5 | math |
| frontiermath tiers 1 3 v2 | 88.8%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] maxPublished Sep 29, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY Open source ↗ | 88.8 | math |
| gpqa diamond | 95.6%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] maxPublished Sep 29, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY Open source ↗ | 95.6 | reasoning |
| hle tools | 64.5%Official model cards via models.devLab-reported; metric score; transcribed by MIT models.dev catalog; not independently evaluated [variant] with toolsPublished Sep 28, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation; MIT transcription Open source ↗ | 64.5 | reasoning |
| livebench coding code completion 2026_06_25 | 84.8%LiveBenchLiveBench subtask result; dataset edition 2026_06_25; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the score CSV, not the dataset edition or individual evaluation date [variant] 2026_06_25Published Oct 7, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation; Apache-2.0 code Open source ↗ | 84.8 | coding |
| livebench coding code generation 2026_06_25 | 93.0%LiveBenchLiveBench subtask result; dataset edition 2026_06_25; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the score CSV, not the dataset edition or individual evaluation date [variant] 2026_06_25Published Oct 7, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation; Apache-2.0 code Open source ↗ | 93.0 | coding |
| livebench coding javascript 2026_06_25 | 36.4%LiveBenchLiveBench subtask result; dataset edition 2026_06_25; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the score CSV, not the dataset edition or individual evaluation date [variant] 2026_06_25Published Oct 7, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation; Apache-2.0 code Open source ↗ | 36.4 | coding |
| livebench coding python 2026_06_25 | 35%LiveBenchLiveBench subtask result; dataset edition 2026_06_25; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the score CSV, not the dataset edition or individual evaluation date [variant] 2026_06_25Published Oct 7, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation; Apache-2.0 code Open source ↗ | 35.0 | coding |
| livebench coding typescript 2026_06_25 | 46.7%LiveBenchLiveBench subtask result; dataset edition 2026_06_25; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the score CSV, not the dataset edition or individual evaluation date [variant] 2026_06_25Published Oct 7, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation; Apache-2.0 code Open source ↗ | 46.7 | coding |
| livebench math amps hard 2026_06_25 | 98%LiveBenchLiveBench subtask result; dataset edition 2026_06_25; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the score CSV, not the dataset edition or individual evaluation date [variant] 2026_06_25Published Oct 7, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation; Apache-2.0 code Open source ↗ | 98.0 | math |
| livebench math integrals with game 2026_06_25 | 100%LiveBenchLiveBench subtask result; dataset edition 2026_06_25; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the score CSV, not the dataset edition or individual evaluation date [variant] 2026_06_25Published Oct 7, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation; Apache-2.0 code Open source ↗ | 100.0 | math |
| livebench math math comp 2026_06_25 | 97.1%LiveBenchLiveBench subtask result; dataset edition 2026_06_25; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the score CSV, not the dataset edition or individual evaluation date [variant] 2026_06_25Published Oct 7, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation; Apache-2.0 code Open source ↗ | 97.1 | math |
| livebench math olympiad 2026_06_25 | 91.7%LiveBenchLiveBench subtask result; dataset edition 2026_06_25; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the score CSV, not the dataset edition or individual evaluation date [variant] 2026_06_25Published Oct 7, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation; Apache-2.0 code Open source ↗ | 91.7 | math |
| livebench math simplify 2026_06_25 | 72.4%LiveBenchLiveBench subtask result; dataset edition 2026_06_25; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the score CSV, not the dataset edition or individual evaluation date [variant] 2026_06_25Published Oct 7, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation; Apache-2.0 code Open source ↗ | 72.4 | math |
| livebench reasoning connections 2026_06_25 | 98.5%LiveBenchLiveBench subtask result; dataset edition 2026_06_25; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the score CSV, not the dataset edition or individual evaluation date [variant] 2026_06_25Published Oct 7, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation; Apache-2.0 code Open source ↗ | 98.5 | reasoning |
| livebench reasoning consecutive events 2026_06_25 | 90.9%LiveBenchLiveBench subtask result; dataset edition 2026_06_25; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the score CSV, not the dataset edition or individual evaluation date [variant] 2026_06_25Published Oct 7, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation; Apache-2.0 code Open source ↗ | 90.9 | reasoning |
| livebench reasoning logic with navigation 2026_06_25 | 80%LiveBenchLiveBench subtask result; dataset edition 2026_06_25; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the score CSV, not the dataset edition or individual evaluation date [variant] 2026_06_25Published Oct 7, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation; Apache-2.0 code Open source ↗ | 80.0 | reasoning |
| livebench reasoning spatial 2026_06_25 | 98%LiveBenchLiveBench subtask result; dataset edition 2026_06_25; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the score CSV, not the dataset edition or individual evaluation date [variant] 2026_06_25Published Oct 7, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation; Apache-2.0 code Open source ↗ | 98.0 | reasoning |
| livebench reasoning theory of mind 2026_06_25 | 69.2%LiveBenchLiveBench subtask result; dataset edition 2026_06_25; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the score CSV, not the dataset edition or individual evaluation date [variant] 2026_06_25Published Oct 7, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation; Apache-2.0 code Open source ↗ | 69.2 | reasoning |
| livebench reasoning zebra puzzle 2026_06_25 | 100%LiveBenchLiveBench subtask result; dataset edition 2026_06_25; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the score CSV, not the dataset edition or individual evaluation date [variant] 2026_06_25Published Oct 7, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation; Apache-2.0 code Open source ↗ | 100.0 | reasoning |
| lmarena text | 1466.6 eloLMArena / ArenaPublished source fact [variant] text / overallPublished Oct 2, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY-4.0 Open source ↗ | 79.1 | preference |
| otis mock aime 2024 2025 | 100%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] maxPublished Sep 29, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY Open source ↗ | 100.0 | math |
| terminal bench v4 0 | 70.6%Official model cards via models.devLab-reported; metric score; transcribed by MIT models.dev catalog; not independently evaluated [variant] 4.0Published Sep 28, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation; MIT transcription Open source ↗ | 70.6 | coding |
| terminal bench v4 0 | 61.8%Terminal-BenchTerminal-Bench 4.0; published harness submission, 95% CI retained at source [variant] Claude Code; maxPublished Oct 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · Apache-2.0; factual citation Open source ↗ | 61.8 | coding |
Normalization uses fixed absolute 0–100 scales for each unit, independently of other models that have a result on each benchmark. Coverage and evidence breadth still affect the composite; compare the evaluation conditions before reading a small score gap as decisive. “lab-reported” marks the provider's own published figure.
Sources: in and pending
in Reported (5)
- Epoch AI Benchmarking · arrived Oct 8, 2026
- Official model cards via models.dev · arrived Oct 8, 2026
- LiveBench · arrived Oct 8, 2026
- LMArena / Arena · arrived Oct 8, 2026
- Terminal-Bench · arrived Oct 8, 2026
pending Awaiting (2)
- ARC Prize · carries 13% of expected weight
- Humanity’s Last Exam · carries 13% of expected weight
The confidence % rises as pending sources publish. Some sources never cover some models — that is why 100% confidence arrives at 80% of expected weight, not at full coverage.