DeepSeek-R1: Price, Context, Benchmarks, and Release Details
47.9
SI Score (method si-v3-retained-evidence-2)
#111 of 140 ranked
88% confidence 88 percent, High confidence — 5 of 8 expected sources in
Coverage 70% of expected source weight · 100% confidence at 80% coverage
Pillar breakdown
Coding (weight 40 percent) 44.5
Math (weight 15 percent) 86.6
Preference (weight 15 percent) 70.3
Reasoning (weight 30 percent) 18.9
Pillar weights: reasoning 30% · math 15% · coding 40% · preference 15%. Benchmark results use fixed 0–100 scales before averaging; incomplete evidence is shrunk toward 50.
Facts
- Input price / 1M
- $0.55LiteLLMFirst-party API Standard token rate; MIT LiteLLM transcription. Provider documentation: not supplied in the MIT entry; rate is a transcription, not independently verified. Exact endpoint only; cache/batch/long-context rates excluded
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - Output price / 1M
- $2.19LiteLLMFirst-party API Standard token rate; MIT LiteLLM transcription. Provider documentation: not supplied in the MIT entry; rate is a transcription, not independently verified. Exact endpoint only; cache/batch/long-context rates excluded
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - Context window
- 128Kmodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - Max output
- 32.8Kmodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - Released
- Jan 20, 2025models.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - Open weights
- Yesmodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - License
- not yet reported
- Input modalities
- textmodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗
Benchmark results
13 results| Benchmark | Raw result | Normalized (0–100) | Pillar |
|---|---|---|---|
| aider polyglot | 71.4%Aider polyglotPublished source fact [variant] Aider polyglot; 225 cases; 2 attemptsPublished Jun 6, 2025
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · Apache-2.0 Open source ↗ | 71.4 | coding |
| arc agi v1 public eval | 27.0%ARC PrizeARC Prize steward-published result; exact edition/subset; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the aggregate export, not the evaluation date. [variant] deepseek_r1_0528-openrouterPublished Oct 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation Open source ↗ | 27.0 | reasoning |
| arc agi v1 semi private | 21.2%ARC PrizeARC Prize steward-published result; exact edition/subset; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the aggregate export, not the evaluation date. [variant] deepseek_r1_0528-openrouterPublished Oct 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation Open source ↗ | 21.2 | reasoning |
| arc agi v1 semi private | 15.8%ARC PrizeARC Prize steward-published result; exact edition/subset; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the aggregate export, not the evaluation date. [variant] R1Published Oct 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation Open source ↗ | 15.8 | reasoning |
| arc agi v2 public eval | 0.3%ARC PrizeARC Prize steward-published result; exact edition/subset; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the aggregate export, not the evaluation date. [variant] deepseek_r1_0528-openrouterPublished Oct 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation Open source ↗ | 0.3 | reasoning |
| arc agi v2 public eval | 0.3%ARC PrizeARC Prize steward-published result; exact edition/subset; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the aggregate export, not the evaluation date. [variant] R1Published Oct 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation Open source ↗ | 0.3 | reasoning |
| arc agi v2 semi private | 1.1%ARC PrizeARC Prize steward-published result; exact edition/subset; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the aggregate export, not the evaluation date. [variant] deepseek_r1_0528-openrouterPublished Oct 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation Open source ↗ | 1.1 | reasoning |
| arc agi v2 semi private | 1.3%ARC PrizeARC Prize steward-published result; exact edition/subset; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the aggregate export, not the evaluation date. [variant] R1Published Oct 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation Open source ↗ | 1.3 | reasoning |
| gpqa diamond | 76.3%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] Published May 29, 2025
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY Open source ↗ | 76.3 | reasoning |
| lmarena text | 1372.7 eloLMArena / ArenaPublished source fact [variant] text / overallPublished Oct 2, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY-4.0 Open source ↗ | 70.3 | preference |
| math level 5 | 96.6%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] Published May 29, 2025
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY Open source ↗ | 96.6 | math |
| otis mock aime 2024 2025 | 66.4%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] Published May 29, 2025
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY Open source ↗ | 66.4 | math |
| terminal bench | 6.1%Official model cards via models.devLab-reported; metric success rate; transcribed by MIT models.dev catalog; not independently evaluated [variant] Published Mar 11, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation; MIT transcription Open source ↗ | 6.1 | coding |
Normalization uses fixed absolute 0–100 scales for each unit, independently of other models that have a result on each benchmark. Coverage and evidence breadth still affect the composite; compare the evaluation conditions before reading a small score gap as decisive. “lab-reported” marks the provider's own published figure.
Sources: in and pending
in Reported (5)
- Aider polyglot · arrived Oct 8, 2026
- ARC Prize · arrived Oct 8, 2026
- Epoch AI Benchmarking · arrived Oct 8, 2026
- Official model cards via models.dev · arrived Oct 8, 2026
- LMArena / Arena · arrived Oct 8, 2026
pending Awaiting (3)
- Humanity’s Last Exam · carries 12% of expected weight
- LiveBench · carries 12% of expected weight
- Terminal-Bench · carries 6% of expected weight
The confidence % rises as pending sources publish. Some sources never cover some models — that is why 100% confidence arrives at 80% of expected weight, not at full coverage.